Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Arthur Koestler CBE (UK: / ˈ k ɜː s t l ər /, US: / ˈ k ɛ s t-/; German:; Hungarian: Kösztler Artúr; 5 September 1905 – 1 March 1983) was an Austro-Hungarian-born author and journalist. Koestler was born in Budapest , and was educated in Austria, apart from his early school years.
Koestler's contribution appeared on 2 October 1969. Sins of Omission: While Six Million Died by Arthur D. More. Reviewed in the Observer, 7 April 1968. The Future if any: The Biological Time-Bomb by Gordon Rattray Taylor. Reviewed in the Observer, 21 April 1968. Going Down the Drain : The Doomsday Book by Gordon Rattray Taylor.
Darkness at Noon (German: Sonnenfinsternis) is a novel by Austrian-Hungarian-born novelist Arthur Koestler, first published in 1940.His best known work, it is the tale of Rubashov, an Old Bolshevik who is arrested, imprisoned, and tried for treason against the government that he helped to create.
Download QR code; Print/export ... Pages in category "Arthur Koestler" ... Media in category "Arthur Koestler" The following 7 files are in this category, out of 7 ...
Written during the middle of World War II, Arrival and Departure reflects Koestler's own plight as a Hungarian refugee. Like Koestler, the main character, Peter Slavek, is a former member of the Communist party. [2] He escapes to "Neutralia," a neutral country based on Portugal, where Koestler himself had gone, and flees from there.
" Réflexions sur la potence" by Arthur Koestler, translated from the English "Reflections on Hanging" " Réflexions sur la guillotine" by Albert Camus " La Peine de mort en France", an introduction by Jean Bloch-Michel
The Lotus and the Robot is a 1960 book by Arthur Koestler, in which the author explores eastern mysticism.Although later dated by Westerners' greater exposure to Asian practices, it concentrates mainly on Indian and Japanese traditions, [1] which form the two parts—the "lotus" and the "robot" respectively.
According to Koestler, the great cosmological systems, from Ptolemy to Copernicus, have always reflected the metaphysical and psychological prejudices of their authors. Furthermore, it would be wrong to think of the evolution of scientific progress as if it moved in a purely rational way on an ascending vertical line.