Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Truth telling is crucial in media ethics as any opposition of truth telling is considered deception. Anything shown by the media whether print or video is considered to be original. When a statement is written in an article or a video is shown of a public official, it is the original “truthful” words of the individual official themselves.
It was argued in moral theology, and now in ethics, that mental reservation was a way to fulfill obligations both to tell the truth and to keep secrets from those not entitled to know them (for example, because of the seal of the confessional or other clauses of confidentiality). Mental reservation, however, is regarded as unjustifiable without ...
Further, the duty of confidentiality is a constant reminder to lawyers of the loyalty they owe to their clients. Another rationale is to protect the human dignity of the client. In criminal cases, confidentiality is also justified to prevent the use of tricked confessions or admissions.
Confidentiality agreements that "seal" litigation settlements are not uncommon, but this can leave regulators and society ignorant of public hazards. In the U.S. state of Washington, for example, journalists discovered that about two dozen medical malpractice cases had been improperly sealed by judges, leading to improperly weak discipline by ...
In this set of lectures, Foucault presents how feeling obligated to tell the truth about yourself has changed throughout history. [1] For scholars of law, society , and crime , these lectures provide a distinct historical perspective regarding the different methods used in legal settings to find important truths .
Truth or verity is the property of being in accord with fact or reality. [1] In everyday language, it is typically ascribed to things that aim to represent reality or otherwise correspond to it, such as beliefs, propositions, and declarative sentences.
The opportunity to edit without linking to a person's real world identity provides a degree of confidentiality to those who could be placed at risk if they edited using their legal names. [2] This confidentiality is not guaranteed, however, and is largely dependent on editors withholding personal information about themselves.
The Inter-American Court and some theorists have suggested that truth-telling may be a form of partial reparations to victims of human rights abuses. [34] [35] [36] Right to truth is related to the fight against impunity as establishing the truth about a past event is the first step in holding perpetrators accountable. [37] [38] [39]