Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court of India quashed the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admissions into all medical and dental colleges on 18 July 2013. The apex court ruled that the Medical Council of India cannot conduct a unified examination. [12] According to a 2013 announcement by CBSE, [13] CBSE planned to conduct AIPMT on 4 May 2014. [14]
The most common admission criterion is the final grade of the university entrance qualification, that is the high school completion certificate formally allowing the applicant to study at a German university. Typically, this is the Abitur. The final grade takes into account the grades of the final exams as well as the course grades.
The Supreme Court later postponed the hearing to 18 July. On 18 July, the Supreme Court ordered the NTA to publish the results of the entire exam, including center and city-wise results, by 12 noon on 20 July, while keeping the identity of the students hidden. The court announced it will resume the hearing on 22 July. [39]
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 (1995), was an opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether a state university might, consistent with the First Amendment, withhold from student religious publications funding provided to similar secular student publications.
Professional experience: Judicial Experience: Associate Justice, NC Supreme Court (Sept 2023 - Present); Judge, NC Court of Appeals (Jan 2023 - Sept 2023); Southern Coalition for Social Justice ...
The U.S. Supreme Court stated that non-residents had a protected privilege of practicing law on substantially similar terms as those enjoyed by residents of the state. [12] Therefore, a state cannot discriminate against non-resident applicants for admission on motion solely because the applicant does not reside in the state.
Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that controlling the execution of a physical process, by running a computer program did not preclude patentability of the invention as a whole.