Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In number theory, the general number field sieve (GNFS) is the most efficient classical algorithm known for factoring integers larger than 10 100. Heuristically, its complexity for factoring an integer n (consisting of ⌊log 2 n ⌋ + 1 bits) is of the form
Number field sieve (NFS) is an integer factorization method, it can be: General number field sieve (GNFS): Number field sieve for any integer Special number field sieve (SNFS): Number field sieve for integers of a certain special form
As of 2022, the algorithm with best theoretical asymptotic running time is the general number field sieve (GNFS), first published in 1993, [6] running ...
In number theory, a branch of mathematics, the special number field sieve (SNFS) is a special-purpose integer factorization algorithm. The general number field sieve (GNFS) was derived from it. The special number field sieve is efficient for integers of the form r e ± s, where r and s are small (for instance Mersenne numbers).
RSA-150 has 150 decimal digits (496 bits), and was withdrawn from the challenge by RSA Security. RSA-150 was eventually factored into two 75-digit primes by Aoki et al. in 2004 using the general number field sieve (GNFS), years after bigger RSA numbers that were still part of the challenge had been solved. The value and factorization are as ...
The quadratic sieve algorithm (QS) is an integer factorization algorithm and, in practice, the second-fastest method known (after the general number field sieve). It is still the fastest for integers under 100 decimal digits or so, and is considerably simpler than the number field sieve. It is a general-purpose factorization algorithm, meaning ...
However, many-digit numbers that do not have factors in the small primes can require days or months to factor with the trial division. In such cases other methods are used such as the quadratic sieve and the general number field sieve (GNFS).
The former uses n as the number of digits of the number to be factored, while the latter uses n as the number to be factored itself. To be consistent, I'll change the GNFS running time to the SNFS way. The current formula for GNFS needs to be corrected anyway since it is wrong in both context. Warut 22:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)