enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    367 U.S. 497 (1961) ripeness to challenge statute banning contraceptives: Mapp v. Ohio: Criminal procedure: 367 U.S. 643 (1961) search and seizure, exclusionary rule Marcus v. Search Warrant: 367 U.S. 717 (1961) Procedural burden on state in seizure of obscene material Hamilton v. Alabama: 368 U.S. 52 (1961)

  4. Dollree Mapp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollree_Mapp

    Dollree Mapp (October 30, 1923 – October 31, 2014) was the appellant in the Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio (1961). She argued that her right to privacy in her home, the Fourth Amendment, was violated by police officers who entered her house with what she thought to be a fake search warrant. [1]

  5. Wolf v. Colorado - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_v._Colorado

    However, because most of the states' rules proved to be ineffective in deterrence, the Court overruled Wolf in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). That landmark case made history as the exclusionary rule enforceable against the states through the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the same extent that it applied against the ...

  6. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

    In its 1961 decision Mapp v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the exclusionary rule—which prevents the government from using evidence in criminal prosecutions if it had been illegally obtained—applies to the U.S. states as well as to the federal government. In 1966, the Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v.

  7. Category:1961 in United States case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1961_in_United...

    Pages in category "1961 in United States case law" ... Mapp v. Ohio; Marcus v. Search Warrant; McGowan v. Maryland; Monroe v. Pape; N. Norris v. Moskin Stores, Inc ...

  8. Aguilar–Spinelli test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aguilar–Spinelli_test

    It was not until Mapp v. Ohio , 367 U.S. 643 (1961), [ 3 ] that the exclusionary rule was held to be binding on the states through the doctrine of selective incorporation.) Subsequently, the defense in many criminal trials attempted to prove that a search warrant was invalid, thus making the search illegal and hence the evidence obtained ...

  9. Warren Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Court

    The Warren Court was the period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1953 to 1969 when Earl Warren served as the chief justice.The Warren Court is often considered the most liberal court in U.S. history.