enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Historicity of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

    Questions on biblical historicity are typically separated into evaluations of whether the Old Testament and Hebrew Bible accurately record the history of ancient Israel and Judah and the second Temple period, and whether the Christian New Testament is an accurate record of the historical Jesus and of the Apostolic Age. This tends to vary ...

  3. Biblical archaeology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_archaeology

    The Levant and Canaan. Biblical archaeology is an academic school and a subset of Biblical studies and Levantine archaeology.Biblical archaeology studies archaeological sites from the Ancient Near East and especially the Holy Land (also known as Land of Israel and Canaan), from biblical times.

  4. List of inscriptions in biblical archaeology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_inscriptions_in...

    The text is largely an account of a military campaign against the ancient Libyans, but the last three of the 28 lines deal with a separate campaign in Canaan, including the first documented instance of the name Israel in the historical record, and the only documented record in Ancient Egypt. COS 2.6 / ANET 376–378 / EP [3] Bubastite Portal

  5. List of biblical figures identified in extra-biblical sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_biblical_figures...

    These are biblical figures unambiguously identified in contemporary sources according to scholarly consensus.Biblical figures that are identified in artifacts of questionable authenticity, for example the Jehoash Inscription and the bullae of Baruch ben Neriah, or who are mentioned in ancient but non-contemporary documents, such as David and Balaam, [n 1] are excluded from this list.

  6. Biblical maximalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_maximalism

    Due to differences between the Bible and 19th- and 20th-century archaeological findings, there exist discrepancies between these two parties of biblical exegetists: the biblical maximalists argue that prior to Judaism's Babylonian Captivity (the period that spanned the 6th-century B.C.), the Bible serves an accurate historical source and should ...

  7. Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of...

    It has been claimed that the author of Acts used the writings of Josephus (specifically Antiquities of the Jews) as a historical source. [13] [14] The majority of scholars reject both this claim and the claim that Josephus borrowed from Acts, [15] [16] [17] arguing instead that Luke and Josephus drew on common traditions and historical sources.

  8. A 2,000-Year-Old Sarcophagus Was Just Unsealed—and the Mummy ...

    www.aol.com/2-000-old-sarcophagus-just-120000677...

    After initially probing a 2,000-year-old sarcophagus in Naples with a micro camera, archaeologists were encouraged enough by what they saw to step inside this sealed tomb for the first time. But ...

  9. What Did the Biblical Writers Know and When Did They Know It?

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Did_the_Biblical...

    What Archaeology Can Tell Us about the Reality of Ancient Israel [1] is a 2001 book by biblical scholar and archaeologist William G. Dever detailing his response to the claims of minimalists to the historicity and value of the Hebrew Bible. The book was also conceived as a response to Thomas L. Thompson's minimalist book The Bible in History.