Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In August 2014 the source code for the game's X-Ray Engine 1.5.10 became available on GitHub under a non-open-source license. [224] The successor's engine, X-ray 1.6.02, became available too. [ 225 ] [ 226 ] As of October 2019 the xray-16 engine community fork, "OpenXRay", achieved compiling state and support for the two games Call of Pripyat ...
Only the game engines in this table are developed under an open-source license, which means that the reuse and modification of only the code is permitted. As some of the games' content created by the developers (sound, graphics, video and other artwork) is proprietary or restricted in use, the whole games are non-free and restricted in reuse ...
After selling well the indie game's Unity source code was released on GitHub [513] to help other developers. [514] [515] Death Ray Manta: 2012 2015 Arena shooter Proprietary: educational purposes Bagfull of Wrong / Rob Fearon The GameMaker Studio based game's source code was released in 2015 with a Humble Indie Bundle. [516] The assets followed ...
The code was released under the GPL-2.0-or-later, then GPL-3.0-or-later, while the data is still proprietary. Now known as Aleph One: Mega (service) Mega Limited 201? 2017 No No No MEGA Limited Code Review License Mega Limited released the source code to their client-side software around 28 January 2017 under an own license on github.com. [32] [33]
This table lists for each license what organizations from the FOSS community have approved it – be it as a "free software" or as an "open source" license – , how those organizations categorize it, and the license compatibility between them for a combined or mixed derivative work. Organizations usually approve specific versions of software ...
The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."
The Unlicense software license, published around 2010, offers a public-domain waiver text with a fall-back public-domain-like license, inspired by permissive licenses but without an attribution clause. [12] [13] In 2015 GitHub reported that approximately 102,000 of their 5.1 million licensed projects, or 2%, use the Unlicense. [note 3]
The CLA leaves copyright with the contributor and allows the project to relicense the code but with a restriction based on the license the contribution was made under: 2.3 Outbound License Based on the grant of rights in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, if We include Your Contribution in a Material, We may license the Contribution under any license ...