Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Mega Limited released the source code to their client-side software around 28 January 2017 under an own license on github.com. [32] [33] MS-DOS 1.25 and 2.0 Microsoft: 1982 2018 Yes Yes Yes MIT: On 25 March 2014 Microsoft made the code to MS-DOS 1.25 and 2.0 available to the public under a Microsoft Research License for educational purposes.
This table lists for each license what organizations from the FOSS community have approved it – be it as a "free software" or as an "open source" license – , how those organizations categorize it, and the license compatibility between them for a combined or mixed derivative work. Organizations usually approve specific versions of software ...
On May 26, 2020, the source code of Soldat was released under MIT license on GitHub. [33] Sopwith: 1984 2014 Shoot 'em up: GPL: GPL: 2D: The C and x86 assembly source code to Sopwith was released in 2000, [34] at first under a non-commercial use license, but later under the GNU GPL at the request of fans. [35] Speed Dreams: 2010 2023 Sim racing ...
This is the most restrictive of the Microsoft Shared Source licenses. The source code is made available to view for reference purposes only, mainly to be able to view Microsoft classes source code while debugging. [20] Developers may not distribute or modify the code for commercial or non-commercial purposes. [21]
A GitHub study in 2015 on their statistical data found that the MIT license was the most prominent FOSS license on that platform. [ 38 ] In June 2016 an analysis of the Fedora Project 's packages showed as most used licenses the GPL family, followed by MIT, BSD, the LGP family, Artistic (for Perl packages), LPPL (for texlive packages), and ASL.
The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."
The license was confirmed as a GPL-compatible free software license by the Free Software Foundation, but its use is "not recommended". [1] In 2009, the Open Source Initiative chose not to approve the license as an open-source license due to redundancy with the Fair License. [2] The WTFPL version 2 is an accepted Copyfree license. [14]
Proprietary software is usually offered under a restrictive license that bans copying and reuse and often limits the purchaser to using the software on one computer. [5] [26] Source code is rarely available. Derivative software works and reverse engineering are usually explicitly prohibited. [26]