Ad
related to: murdock vs pennsylvania court case accesscourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- Court Criminal Check
Court Records, Millions Of Citizens
Available In Our Database. Search
- Court Case Records
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Murdock v. Pennsylvania , 319 U.S. 105 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance requiring door-to-door salespersons ("solicitors") to purchase a license was an unconstitutional tax on religious exercise.
Overruling Jones v. City of Opelika I on rehearing Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: 319 U.S. 105 (1943) licensing fee for door-to-door solicitors was an unconstitutional tax on the Jehovah's Witnesses' right to freely exercise their religion—decided same day as Jones v. City of Opelika II: Martin v. Struthers: 319 U.S. 141 (1943)
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The opinion compares the facts of the case to prior court precedent such as Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee, Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis, and Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward for broadcast licenses, liquor licenses, and corporate charters respectively. The opinion also stated that even if a private ...
The Murdoch family, famous for helming one of the world’s most influential news empires, is locked in a secret court battle over succession and control, according to a New York Times report ...
The Court ultimately affirmed the decision of the state court on the federal law and did not decide the two issues of state law. Murdock v. Memphis is cited today as instrumental in establishing the principle that interpretation of state law is the province of the state courts, and that, in particular, the state Supreme Courts, rather than the ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Friday that mail-in ballots with incorrect dates will not be counted in November, reversing a previous ruling from a lower court in the battleground state. The ...
Ad
related to: murdock vs pennsylvania court case accesscourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month