Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In cognitive psychology, chunking is a process by which small individual pieces of a set of information are bound together to create a meaningful whole later on in memory. [1] The chunks, by which the information is grouped, are meant to improve short-term retention of the material, thus bypassing the limited capacity of working memory and ...
For example, in recalling a phone number, chunking the digits into three groups (area code, prefix, and extension). This method of remembering phone numbers is far more effective than attempting to remember a string of 10 digits. Practice and the usage of existing information in long-term memory can lead to additional improvements in chunking.
Chunking is the process of grouping pieces of information together into “chunks”. [4] This allows for the brain to collect more information at a given time by reducing it to more-specific groups. [4] With the processes of chunking, the external environment is linked to the internal cognitive processes of the brain. [4]
Chunking is the process of breaking down numbers into smaller units to remember the information or data, this helps recall numbers and math facts. [64] An example of this chunking process is a telephone number; this is chunked with three digits, three digits, then four digits.
The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers is a book by Daniel Schacter, former chair of Harvard University's Psychology Department and a leading memory researcher. The book revolves around the theory that "the seven sins of memory" are similar to the seven deadly sins , and that if one tries to avoid committing these sins, it ...
For example, the hippocampus is believed to be involved in spatial and declarative memory, as well as consolidating short-term into long-term memory. Studies have shown that declarative memories move between the limbic system, deep within the brain, and the outer, cortical regions. These are distinct from the mechanisms of the more primitive ...
The spacing effect demonstrates that learning is more effective when study sessions are spaced out. This effect shows that more information is encoded into long-term memory by spaced study sessions, also known as spaced repetition or spaced presentation, than by massed presentation ("cramming").
Roediger quickly found problems with these studies and their methods. [11] Harris made an attempt to make a case for decay theory by using tones instead of word lists and his results are congruent making a case for decay theory. [12] In addition, McKone used implicit memory tasks as opposed to explicit tasks to address the confound problems.