Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
At first, pairwise comparisons will be made between all the actions for each criterion: (,) = () (,) is the difference between the evaluations of two actions for criterion . Of course, these differences depend on the measurement scales used and are not always easy to compare for the decision maker.
The PAPRIKA method resolves this 'impossibility' problem by ensuring that the number of pairwise rankings that decision-makers need to perform is kept to a minimum – i.e. only a small fraction of the potentially millions or billions of undominated pairs – so that the burden on decision-makers is minimized and the method is practicable.
PRISM has been selected for the Google Summer of Code programme in 2013 and 2014. The tool and its creators have won several awards: the 2024 ETAPS Test-of-Time Tool Award and the HVC 2016 Award . The PRISM probabilistic model checker appears unrelated to the PRISM probabilistic logic programming system (PRogramming In Statistical Modelling ...
Their method was a general one, which considered all kinds of pairwise comparisons. [7] Tukey's and Scheffé's methods allow any number of comparisons among a set of sample means. On the other hand, Dunnett's test only compares one group with the others, addressing a special case of multiple comparisons problem—pairwise comparisons of ...
Eisinga, Heskes, Pelzer and Te Grotenhuis (2017) [9] provide an exact test for pairwise comparison of Friedman rank sums, implemented in R. The Eisinga c.s. exact test offers a substantial improvement over available approximate tests, especially if the number of groups ( k {\displaystyle k} ) is large and the number of blocks ( n {\displaystyle ...
In computer science, all-pairs testing or pairwise testing is a combinatorial method of software testing that, for each pair of input parameters to a system (typically, a software algorithm), tests all possible discrete combinations of those parameters.
The method involves the decision-maker repeatedly pairwise comparing and ranking alternatives defined on two criteria or attributes at a time and involving a trade-off, and then, if the decision-maker chooses to continue, pairwise comparisons of alternatives defined on successively more criteria.
The model is named after Ralph A. Bradley and Milton E. Terry, [3] who presented it in 1952, [4] although it had already been studied by Ernst Zermelo in the 1920s. [1] [5] [6] Applications of the model include the ranking of competitors in sports, chess, and other competitions, [7] the ranking of products in paired comparison surveys of consumer choice, analysis of dominance hierarchies ...