Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Jury selection and techniques for voir dire are taught to law students in trial advocacy courses. However, attorneys sometimes use expert assistance in systematically choosing the jury via a process of scientific jury selection, although other uses of jury research are becoming more common. The jury selected is said to have been "empaneled".
A Michigan Law Review article, published in 1978, asserted that young people, during that period, were under-represented on the nation's jury rolls. [11] A 2012 study from Duke University published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics investigated the effect of jury selection and racial composition on trial outcomes. The study found that black ...
Scientific jury selection is used during the jury selection phase of the trial, during which lawyers have the opportunity to question jurors. It almost always entails an expert's assistance in the attorney 's use of peremptory challenges —the right to reject a certain number of potential jurors without stating a reason—during jury selection.
Even experts in the art of jury selection say there are limits to what any lawyer can do. “We never pick a jury. We unpick jurors,” said Tama Kudman, a veteran West Palm Beach, Florida ...
The murder trial of Donna Adelson is set to begin with jury selection on Tuesday Sept. 17 in the Leon County ... Most experienced defense lawyers prepare their client to testify but wait till the ...
“What’s important to understand with New York state as compared to federal jury selection…is that it’s attorney-led voir dire,” Phillip Hamilton, a criminal defense attorney in New York ...
In law, the right of peremptory challenge is a right in jury selection for the attorneys to reject a certain number of potential jurors without stating a reason. Other potential jurors may be challenged for cause, i.e. by giving a good reason why they might be unable to reach a fair verdict, but the challenge will be considered by the presiding judge and may be denied.
Eliminating peremptory challenges in jury selection is needed to dismantle systemic racism in our legal system, say Miriam Krinsky, Chris Kemmitt and Adam Murphy. Opinion: What’s wrong with the ...