enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Federal question jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_question_jurisdiction

    Article III of the United States Constitution permits federal courts to hear such cases, so long as the United States Congress passes a statute to that effect. However, when Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1789, which authorized the newly created federal courts to hear such cases, it initially chose not to allow the lower federal courts to possess federal question jurisdiction for fear ...

  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisville_&_Nashville...

    25 Stat. 434, c. 866 (then-current federal question jurisdiction statute; current analogue 28 U.S.C. § 1331) Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mottley , 211 U.S. 149 (1908), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that under the existing statutory scheme, federal question jurisdiction could not be predicated on a ...

  4. Title 28 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_28_of_the_United...

    Title 28 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) is the portion of the United States Code (federal statutory law) that governs the federal judicial system. It is divided into six parts: Part I: Organization of Courts

  5. Concurrent jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurrent_jurisdiction

    Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects ... Title 28 of the United States Code, sections 1331 & 1332 give federal courts concurrent jurisdiction with ...

  6. American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Well_Works_Co._v...

    Plaintiff American Well Works Co. manufactured, sold, and held the patent to a particular type of pump, which was known to be the best on the market. The plaintiff sued defendant Layne & Bowler Co. on the grounds that defendant had maliciously libeled and slandered plaintiff's title to the pump by stating that the pump, and certain of its component parts, were infringements upon defendant's pump.

  7. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grable_&_Sons_Metal...

    Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court decision [1] involving the jurisdiction of the federal district courts under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction). [2]

  8. Supreme Court Case Selections Act of 1988 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_Case...

    The Act amended 28 U.S.C. § 1257 to eliminate the right of appeal to the Supreme Court from certain state-court judgments. [3] Prior to the enactment of the Act, if the highest state court had found either a federal statute or treaty to be invalid or a state statute not to be invalid in the face of federal law, the party that had not prevailed ...

  9. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Sovereign...

    The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA) is a United States law, codified at Title 28, §§ 1330, 1332, 1391(f), 1441(d), and 1602–1611 of the United States Code, that established criteria as to whether a foreign sovereign state (or its political subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities) is immune from the jurisdiction of the ...