Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Under common law, false pretense is defined as a representation of a present or past fact, which the thief knows to be false, and which he intends will and does cause the victim to pass title of his property. That is, false pretense is the acquisition of title from a victim by fraud or misrepresentation of a material past or present fact.
In most cases, the defendant will obtain ownership, possession, and control of the property, but the obtaining of any one of these will be sufficient. So, under the Sale of Goods Act, title to goods may pass before possession or control is delivered, or possession may pass before title, or the defendant may obtain control alone, depending on ...
The requisite elements of perhaps the most general form of criminal fraud, theft by false pretense, are the intentional deception of a victim by false representation or pretense with the intent of persuading the victim to part with property and with the victim parting with property in reliance on the representation or pretense and with the ...
Wright Douglas Gillies Jr., 73, is charged with exploitation of an elder adult through a position of trust, and obtaining property under false pretenses, according to court records.
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply . . . for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to ...
Prosecutors say car dealer engaged in a pattern of fraud. Swansea police said they have received complaints from about 25 people regarding Bristol County Auto Exchange since May; an additional 10 ...
In this instance, Mangum, who claims it was all a misunderstanding, has since been charged with obtaining property under false pretense. But how did this happen in the first place?
This offence replaced the offence of obtaining credit by fraud, contrary to section 13(1) of the Debtors Act 1869. [4] The elements of the actus reus are similar to the offence of obtaining property by deception: There must be a deception. This has the same meaning as for section 15 (according to section 16(3) of the Theft Act 1968).