enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Cochrane (organisation) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochrane_(organisation)

    Cochrane involves patients and the public via community curation, to produce systematic reviews and other outputs. Tasks can be organised as 'entry level' or higher. Tasks include: Joining a collaborative volunteer effort to help categorise and summarise healthcare evidence [42] Data extraction and risk of bias assessment

  3. Critical appraisal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_appraisal

    Critical appraisal (or quality assessment) in evidence based medicine, is the use of explicit, transparent methods to assess the data in published research, applying the rules of evidence to factors such as internal validity, adherence to reporting standards, conclusions, generalizability and risk-of-bias.

  4. Julian Higgins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Higgins

    [5] Assessing risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review. The most commonly used tool for assessing risk of bias to date has been the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, which Professor Higgins introduced in 2008. [6] Higgins is the most cited author of The British Medical Journal. [7]

  5. Evidence-based medicine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence-based_medicine

    Systematic reviews may include randomized controlled trials that have low risk of bias, or observational studies that have high risk of bias. In the case of randomized controlled trials, the quality of evidence is high but can be downgraded in five different domains. [73]

  6. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published...

    Even if a study meets the benchmark requirements for and , and is free of bias, there is still a 36% probability that a paper reporting a positive result will be incorrect; if the base probability of a true result is lower, then this will push the PPV lower too. Furthermore, there is strong evidence that the average statistical power of a study ...

  7. Peter C. Gøtzsche - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_C._Gøtzsche

    Gerd Antes of Cochrane Deutschland interpreted the situation as a "governance crisis" and called for "the strict orientation on the objectives and fundamental principles of Cochrane" naming "(s)cientific rigour, knowledge with minimal bias, maximum trust and consistent safeguarding against interest-driven influence on the evidence" as primary.

  8. Jonathan Sterne - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Sterne

    He has been leading the development of the ROBINS-I tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions and the development of the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool for randomized trials. He is also leading a large collaboration of HIV cohort studies that has led to advances in our understanding of prognosis of HIV ...

  9. Kay Dickersin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kay_Dickersin

    The US Cochrane Center coordinated the development of Cochrane's Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from 1994 to 2005, [14] which was then turned over to The Cochrane Library publisher for further development and maintenance. Dickersin's papers related to the Cochrane Collaboration are at the National Library of Medicine. [23]