enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Merrill Lynch does about face on fiduciary-era policy

    www.aol.com/news/merrill-lynch-does-face...

    The fiduciary rule was overturned in March by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. ... Merrill Lynch, along with JPMorgan Chase & Co, effectively banned brokerage retirement accounts last June ...

  3. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrill_Lynch,_Pierce...

    Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit, 547 U.S. 71 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the extent to which state law securities fraud class action claims were preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA).

  4. Merrill Lynch's U-turn on mandatory fee-based accounts ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/merrill-lynch-apos-u-turn...

    The Obama-era fiduciary rule, intended to protect retirement investors, had many good elements, but it was doomed to fail by forcing all accounts to be treated similarly. Merrill Lynch's recent ...

  5. Jones v. Harris Associates - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v._Harris_Associates

    Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc., 694 F.2d 923 (2d Cir. 1982), to deciding whether a mutual fund adviser has breached his fiduciary duty to the fund, the duty created by section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 80a-1 et seq. Gartenberg permits a court to consider, as a factor in determining such a breach, whether the fee ...

  6. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Manning

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrill_Lynch,_Pierce...

    Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Manning, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 8–0, that the jurisdictional test established by §27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is the same as 28 U.S.C. § 1331's [1] test for deciding if a case "arises under" a federal law.

  7. The Securities Arbitration Law Firm of Klayman & Toskes ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2013-05-25-the-securities...

    The Securities Arbitration Law Firm of Klayman & Toskes Files $800,000 Claim Against Merrill Lynch on Behalf of a Retired UPS Employee As It Continues To Investigate Claims on Behalf of Current ...

  8. Merrill Lynch & Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrill_Lynch_&_Co.

    Later that day, Merrill Lynch was sold to Bank of America for 0.8595 share of Bank of America common stock for each Merrill Lynch common share, or about $50 billion or $29 per share. [ 50 ] [ 51 ] This price represented a 70.1% premium over the September 12 closing price or a 38% premium over Merrill's book value of $21 a share, [ 52 ] but also ...

  9. Merrill Lynch bailout: Bonuses for bungling - AOL

    www.aol.com/2009/01/29/merrill-lynch-bailout...

    Former Merrill Lynch CEO, John Thain, gave out up to $4 billion in bonuses before Bank of America took the company over. Normally, bonuses are paid in January, but they were rushed to beat the Jan ...