enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Universal set - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_set

    The category of sets can also be considered to be a universal object that is, again, not itself a set. It has all sets as elements, and also includes arrows for all functions from one set to another. Again, it does not contain itself, because it is not itself a set.

  3. Set (abstract data type) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(abstract_data_type)

    As sets can be interpreted as a kind of map (by the indicator function), sets are commonly implemented in the same way as (partial) maps (associative arrays) – in this case in which the value of each key-value pair has the unit type or a sentinel value (like 1) – namely, a self-balancing binary search tree for sorted sets [definition needed ...

  4. List of types of sets - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_types_of_sets

    F σ set; G δ set; Compact set ... List of set identities and relations – Equalities for combinations of sets; List of types of functions ... Text is available ...

  5. Cantor's theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor's_theorem

    Cantor's paradox is the name given to a contradiction following from Cantor's theorem together with the assumption that there is a set containing all sets, the universal set. In order to distinguish this paradox from the next one discussed below, it is important to note what this contradiction is.

  6. List of set identities and relations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_set_identities_and...

    To investigate the left distributivity of set subtraction over unions or intersections, consider how the sets involved in (both of) De Morgan's laws are all related: () = = () always holds (the equalities on the left and right are De Morgan's laws) but equality is not guaranteed in general (that is, the containment might be strict).

  7. Russell's paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_paradox

    Let R be the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. (This set is sometimes called "the Russell set".) If R is not a member of itself, then its definition entails that it is a member of itself; yet, if it is a member of itself, then it is not a member of itself, since it is the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. The ...

  8. Set-builder notation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set-builder_notation

    Set-builder notation can be used to describe a set that is defined by a predicate, that is, a logical formula that evaluates to true for an element of the set, and false otherwise. [2] In this form, set-builder notation has three parts: a variable, a colon or vertical bar separator, and a predicate.

  9. Union (set theory) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_(set_theory)

    For example, the union of three sets A, B, and C contains all elements of A, all elements of B, and all elements of C, and nothing else. Thus, x is an element of A ∪ B ∪ C if and only if x is in at least one of A, B, and C. A finite union is the union of a finite number of sets; the phrase does not imply that the union set is a finite set ...