enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut

    Griswold v. Connecticut , 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to use contraceptives without government restriction. [ 1 ]

  3. Ordered liberty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_liberty

    Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) established that married couples have a right to purchase and use contraception without government interference in a 7–2 decision. Lawrence v. Texas (2003) showed that criminal penalties for sodomy or private sexual acts between consenting adults are unconstitutional. That decision came down in a 6 to 3 ruling.

  4. Estelle Griswold - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estelle_Griswold

    Estelle Naomi Trebert Griswold (June 8, 1900 – August 13, 1981) was a civil rights activist and feminist most commonly known as a defendant in what became the Supreme Court case Griswold v. Connecticut , in which contraception for married couples was legalized in the state of Connecticut , setting the precedent of the right to privacy .

  5. Abortion Opponents Are Also Threatening Birth Control Access

    www.aol.com/abortion-opponents-threatening-birth...

    W hen the U.S. Supreme Court issued its 1965 ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut and legalized the use of contraception by married women, the public response was muted. There is little evidence of ...

  6. Warren Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Court

    Skrupa, but see also Griswold v. Connecticut). The Warren Court's decisions were also strongly nationalist in thrust, as the Court read Congress's power under the Commerce Clause quite broadly and often expressed an unwillingness to allow constitutional rights to vary from state to state (as was explicitly manifested in Cooper v. Aaron ...

  7. Are Republicans coming for no-fault divorce? - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/republicans-coming-no-fault...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    380 U.S. 693 (1965) evidence that is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment may not be relied on to sustain a civil forfeiture: Griswold v. Connecticut: Right to privacy: 381 U.S. 479 (1965) privacy, birth control Estes v. Texas: 381 U.S. 532 (1965) overturning Billy Sol Estes conviction on 14th Amendment due process grounds due to ...

  9. Worried by fall of Roe v. Wade, organizers get same-sex ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/worried-fall-roe-v-wade-100000464.html

    (Griswold v. Connecticut is a 1965 high court ruling that established the right of married couples to use contraception.) ... The law requires the federal government to recognize these marriages ...