Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Alternative online encyclopedias have been proposed as replacements for Wikipedia, including WolframAlpha, [1] as well as the both now-defunct Knol (from Google) [2] [3] and Owl (from AOL). [4] A 2013 review raised alarms regarding Wikipedia's shortcomings on hoaxes, on vandalism, an imbalance of material, and inadequate quality control of ...
Wikipedia always has a lot going on. This page is for news and updates about existing or new projects or initiatives of Wikipedians (e.g. new Collaboration articles, WikiProject help requests or announcements of success, backlogs that really need help, etc.)
John Seigenthaler, an American journalist, was the subject of a defamatory Wikipedia hoax article in May 2005. The hoax raised questions about the reliability of Wikipedia and other websites with user-generated content. Since the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, it has faced several controversies. Wikipedia's open-editing model, which allows any user to edit its encyclopedic pages, has led to ...
Wikipedia Review was an independent Internet forum and blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Foundation projects, in particular the content and conflicts of Wikipedia. [ 3 ] [ 4 ] Wikipedia Review sought to act as a watchdog website , scrutinizing Wikipedia and reporting on its flaws. [ 5 ]
Wikipedia:Deferred changes, proposal to allow bots, the edit filter, and/or ORES to defer suspect edits for review (originally Wikipedia:Deferred revisions). Wikipedia:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions, the original trial proposal. Wikipedia:Patrolled revisions, a request for a passive reviewing system, part of the original proposal.
In a positive review for Nintendo World Report, Jordan Rudek praised the workplace setting of the title, writing that "The story and world of Going Under provide a compelling backdrop for what is essentially a roguelite dungeon-crawler." Rudek also liked the accessibility settings offered to the player, "A variety of accessibility options, such ...
Antisemitic trope – Closure endorsed.There is a rough consensus here that Amakuru acted within discretion. Extraordinary Writ 07:51, 17 December 2022 (UTC) []; The following is an archived debate of the move review of the page above.
Although Wikipedia has its own article peer review process, reviews from respected publications are more than welcome and can help to improve Wikipedia's articles. In most cases Wikipedia will also see an increase in traffic to the articles mentioned, which means that those with poor reviews should be improved to as high a standard as is possible.