Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Weiss magneton was experimentally derived in 1911 as a unit of magnetic moment equal to 1.53 × 10 −24 joules per tesla, which is about 20% of the Bohr magneton. In the summer of 1913, the values for the natural units of atomic angular momentum and magnetic moment were obtained by the Danish physicist Niels Bohr as a consequence of his ...
In order to explain the Zeeman effect in the Bohr atom, Sommerfeld proposed that electrons would be based on three 'quantum numbers', n, k, and m, that described the size of the orbit, the shape of the orbit, and the direction in which the orbit was pointing. [7]
The spin magnetic moment of the electron is =, where is the spin (or intrinsic angular-momentum) vector, is the Bohr magneton, and = is the electron-spin g-factor. Here μ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\mu }}} is a negative constant multiplied by the spin , so the spin magnetic moment is antiparallel to the spin.
Its SI unit is the radian per second per tesla (rad⋅s −1 ⋅T −1) or, equivalently, the coulomb per kilogram (C⋅kg −1). [citation needed] The term "gyromagnetic ratio" is often used [2] as a synonym for a different but closely related quantity, the g-factor. The g-factor only differs from the gyromagnetic ratio in being dimensionless.
The magnetic moment of the electron is =, where μ B is the Bohr magneton, S is electron spin, and the g-factor g S is 2 according to Dirac's theory, but due to quantum electrodynamic effects it is slightly larger in reality: 2.002 319 304 36.
Other magnetic quantum numbers are similarly defined, such as m j for the z-axis component the total electronic angular momentum j, [1] and m I for the nuclear spin I. [2] Magnetic quantum numbers are capitalized to indicate totals for a system of particles, such as M L or m L for the total z-axis orbital angular momentum of all the electrons ...
The magnetic moment would later be explained in quantum theory by the Bohr magneton (), which is used in the Brillouin function. It could be noted that there is a difference in the approaches of Langevin and Bohr, since Langevin assumes a magnetic polarization μ {\displaystyle \mu } as the basis for the derivation, while Bohr start the ...
where N is the Avogadro constant, g is the Landé g-factor, and μ B is the Bohr magneton. In this treatment it has been assumed that the electronic ground state is not degenerate, that the magnetic susceptibility is due only to electron spin and that only the ground state is thermally populated.