Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
If the results are similar between various studies, the data is said to be homogeneous, and the tendency is for these data to be more conclusive. The heterogeneity is indicated by the I 2 . A heterogeneity of less than 50% is termed low, and indicates a greater degree of similarity between study data than an I 2 value above 50%, which indicates ...
The solvency ratio of an insurance company is the size of its capital relative to all risks it has taken. The solvency ratio is most often defined as: The solvency ratio is most often defined as: n e t . a s s e t s ÷ n e t . p r e m i u m . w r i t t e n {\displaystyle net.assets\div net.premium.written}
In the lower plot, both the area and population data have been transformed using the logarithm function. In statistics, data transformation is the application of a deterministic mathematical function to each point in a data set—that is, each data point z i is replaced with the transformed value y i = f(z i), where f is a function.
The Brown–Forsythe test uses the median instead of the mean in computing the spread within each group (¯ vs. ~, above).Although the optimal choice depends on the underlying distribution, the definition based on the median is recommended as the choice that provides good robustness against many types of non-normal data while retaining good statistical power. [3]
Thus the likelihood-ratio test tests whether this ratio is significantly different from one, or equivalently whether its natural logarithm is significantly different from zero. The likelihood-ratio test, also known as Wilks test , [ 2 ] is the oldest of the three classical approaches to hypothesis testing, together with the Lagrange multiplier ...
In statistics, an F-test of equality of variances is a test for the null hypothesis that two normal populations have the same variance.Notionally, any F-test can be regarded as a comparison of two variances, but the specific case being discussed in this article is that of two populations, where the test statistic used is the ratio of two sample variances. [1]
There are several reasons to prefer the likelihood ratio test or the Lagrange multiplier to the Wald test: [18] [19] [20] Non-invariance: As argued above, the Wald test is not invariant under reparametrization, while the likelihood ratio tests will give exactly the same answer whether we work with R, log R or any other monotonic transformation ...
We can derive the value of the G-test from the log-likelihood ratio test where the underlying model is a multinomial model. Suppose we had a sample x = ( x 1 , … , x m ) {\textstyle x=(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{m})} where each x i {\textstyle x_{i}} is the number of times that an object of type i {\textstyle i} was observed.