enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. If and only if - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if

    The corresponding logical symbols are "", "", [6] and , [10] and sometimes "iff".These are usually treated as equivalent. However, some texts of mathematical logic (particularly those on first-order logic, rather than propositional logic) make a distinction between these, in which the first, ↔, is used as a symbol in logic formulas, while ⇔ is used in reasoning about those logic formulas ...

  3. Logical biconditional - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_biconditional

    Venn diagram of (true part in red) In logic and mathematics, the logical biconditional, also known as material biconditional or equivalence or bidirectional implication or biimplication or bientailment, is the logical connective used to conjoin two statements and to form the statement "if and only if" (often abbreviated as "iff " [1]), where is known as the antecedent, and the consequent.

  4. The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hardest_Logic_Puzzle_Ever

    Boolos provides the following clarifications: [1] a single god may be asked more than one question, questions are permitted to depend on the answers to earlier questions, and the nature of Random's response should be thought of as depending on the flip of a fair coin hidden in his brain: if the coin comes down heads, he speaks truly; if tails ...

  5. Necessity and sufficiency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_and_sufficiency

    This can also be expressed as "P only if Q", "P implies Q" or several other variants. It may be the case that several sufficient conditions, when taken together, constitute a single necessary condition (i.e., individually sufficient and jointly necessary), as illustrated in example 5. Example 1 "John is a king" implies that John is male.

  6. Validity (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(logic)

    Many techniques are employed by logicians to represent an argument's logical form. A simple example, applied to two of the above illustrations, is the following: Let the letters 'P', 'Q', and 'S' stand, respectively, for the set of men, the set of mortals, and Socrates. Using these symbols, the first argument may be abbreviated as: All P are Q.

  7. Counterfactual conditional - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfactual_conditional

    On Lewis's account, A > C is (a) vacuously true if and only if there are no worlds where A is true (for example, if A is logically or metaphysically impossible); (b) non-vacuously true if and only if, among the worlds where A is true, some worlds where C is true are closer to the actual world than any world where C is not true; or (c) false ...

  8. Propositional calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

    Not only that, but they will also correspond with any other inference with the same logical form. When a formal system is used to represent formal logic, only statement letters (usually capital roman letters such as , and ) are represented directly. The natural language propositions that arise when they're interpreted are outside the scope of ...

  9. Logical equality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_equality

    Logical equality is an operation on two logical values, typically the values of two propositions, that produces a value of true if and only if both operands are false or both operands are true. The truth table of p EQ q (also written as p = q, p ↔ q, Epq, p ≡ q, or p == q) is as follows: The Venn diagram of A EQ B (red part is true)