enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Oposa v. Factoran - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oposa_v._Factoran

    Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, 224 S.C.R.A. 792 (1993), alternatively titled Minors Oposa v.Factoran or Minors Oposa, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines recognizing the doctrine of intergenerational responsibility on the environment in the Philippine legal system.

  3. Lists of landmark court decisions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_landmark_court...

    Establishes that aboriginal treaty rights are subject to Canadian law, but not to provincial licensing systems. R v Marshall (No 1)R v Marshall (No 2) Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia: Supreme Court: 2014 SCC 44: Constitution Act, 1982, section 35(1) (Aboriginal rights) Established land title for the Tsilhqot'in First Nation.

  4. National Labor Relations Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Labor_Relations...

    The National Labor Relations Commission (Filipino: Pambansang Komisyon sa Ugnayang Paggawa, abbreviated NLRC) is a quasi-judicial agency tasked to promote and maintain industrial peace based on social justice by resolving labor and management disputes involving local and overseas workers through compulsory arbitration and alternative modes of dispute resolution.

  5. Category:Supreme Court of the Philippines cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Supreme_Court_of...

    This page was last edited on 11 January 2021, at 09:44 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  6. People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Philippines...

    The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (R.A. 10175) was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012, becoming effective on October 3. [6] Among the actions criminalized by this law is "cyberlibel". [6] Six days after the law commenced, the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order to stop its implementation.

  7. People of the Philippines v. Hernandez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Philippines...

    The Court was divided upon the decision, having a vote of 6-4 (one justice died a month before its promulgation). But it was later on accepted as valuable jurisprudence, starting with the subsequent case of People of the Philippines v. Geronimo (100 Phil. Reports 90). The case is now a standard case study in Philippine law schools.

  8. Judiciary of the Philippines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_the_Philippines

    [4] [1]: 48 It is the appellate court for cases where "the constitutionality or validity of any treaty, international or executive agreement, law, presidential decree, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation is in question", for the "legality of any tax" and related matters, where the "jurisdiction of any lower court is in ...

  9. Sandiganbayan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandiganbayan

    Facade in 2023. The Sandiganbayan (lit. ' Support of the nation ' [3]) is a special appellate collegial court in the Philippines that has jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases involving graft and corrupt practices and other offenses committed by public officers and employees, including those in government-owned and controlled corporations.

  1. Related searches summary landmark judgement philippines law firm name example essay title

    landmark court decisionsphilippines supreme court cases
    list of landmark decisions