Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Apple unveiled its push into AI, Apple Intelligence, in June and announced new iPhones Monday. We still don't know when exactly the iPhone will have the much-anticipated AI features, though ...
Apple Inc. has been the subject of criticism and legal action. This includes its handling labor violations at its outsourced manufacturing hubs in China, its environmental impact of its supply chains, tax and monopoly practices, a lack of diversity and women in leadership in corporate and retail, various labor conditions (mishandling sexual misconduct complaints), and its response to worker ...
The iOS mobile operating system developed by Apple has had a wide range of bugs and security issues discovered throughout its lifespan, including security exploits discovered in most versions of the operating system related to the practice of jailbreaking (to remove Apple's software restrictions), bypassing the user's lock screen (known as lock screen bypasses), issues relating to battery ...
The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]
You can’t experience Apple Intelligence and the new-and-improved Siri without an iPhone 15 or later. Apple Intelligence solves one of Tim Cook’s biggest problems: finally giving customers a ...
[8] [9] Cingular gave Apple the liberty to develop the iPhone's hardware and software in-house, a rare practice at the time, [10] [11] and paid Apple a fraction of its monthly service revenue (until the iPhone 3G), [12] in exchange for four years of exclusive U.S. sales, until 2011.
An iPhone 5C, the model used by one of the perpetrators of the 2015 San Bernardino attack. The Apple–FBI encryption dispute concerns whether and to what extent courts in the United States can compel manufacturers to assist in unlocking cell phones whose data are cryptographically protected. [1]
Apple's claims that Samsung copied the designs of the iPhone and iPad were deemed invalid. [70] The court also ruled that there was "no possibility" that consumers would confuse the smartphones of the two brands. [71] Also in 2011, Apple filed a claim in Australia that Samsung's infringing product should not be sold in that country. [72]