enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Replaceability argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replaceability_argument

    Animal rights writer Henry S. Salt termed the replaceability argument the "logic of the larder".. In 1789, the utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham endorsed a variant of the argument, contending that painlessly killing a nonhuman animal is beneficial for everyone because it does not harm the animal and the consumers of the meat produced from the animal's body are better off as a result.

  3. Negative utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_utilitarianism

    That is, positive utility functions as a tiebreaker in that it determines which outcome is better (or less bad) when the outcomes considered have equal disutility. [23] "Lexical threshold" negative utilitarianism says that there is some disutility, for instance some extreme suffering, such that no positive utility can counterbalance it. [24 ...

  4. Ethics of eating meat - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_eating_meat

    In a 2014 survey of 406 US philosophy professors, approximately 60% of ethicists and 45% of non-ethicist philosophers said it was at least somewhat "morally bad" to eat meat from mammals. [10] A 2020 survey of 1,812 published English-language philosophers found that 48% said it was permissible to eat animals in ordinary circumstances, while 45% ...

  5. Rule utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_utilitarianism

    Rule utilitarianism is a form of utilitarianism that says an action is right as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, or that "the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance". [1]

  6. Psychology of eating meat - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology_of_eating_meat

    Religious belief in God-given dominion over animals can also justify eating meat. [86] A series of studies published in 2015 asked meat-eating American and Australian undergraduates to "list three reasons why you think it is OK to eat meat." Over 90% of participants offered reasons which the researchers classified among the "four N's":

  7. It’s not your imagination. Men really do eat more meat than ...

    www.aol.com/news/not-imagination-men-really-eat...

    Women, said Naguleswaran, are simply more likely to ditch meat, and to care about how their diet affects the environment and other people. It’s not your imagination. Men really do eat more meat ...

  8. Preference utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preference_utilitarianism

    Preference utilitarianism (also known as preferentialism) is a form of utilitarianism in contemporary philosophy. [1] Unlike value monist forms of utilitarianism, preferentialism values actions that fulfill the most personal interests for the entire circle of people affected by said action.

  9. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  1. Related searches why utilitarian is bad for women to eat meat and drink wine for beginners

    morals of eating meatethical issues of eating meat
    the ethics of eating meatethical arguments against meat
    ethical reasons to eat meat