Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
ACLU v. Ashcroft (2002) Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. 2003 State v. Dalton; McConnell v. FEC; Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) - Amicus curiae; Goodridge v. Department of Public Health - Amicus curiae; Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of New England - Amicus curiae; United States v. American Library Association; 2004 ACLU v. Ashcroft (2004 ...
In 2022, the ACLU petitioned the US Supreme Court to overturn an Arkansas law mandating that companies pledge not to boycott Israel in order to do business with the state. [ 370 ] During the Israel–Hamas war , the New York chapter of the ACLU sued Columbia University for banning its campus chapters of Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for ...
The ACLU filed its lawsuit late Monday in New Hampshire federal court seeking to block Trump's order based on the harm it could harm an immigrant community of Indonesians and others in that state ...
[26] [27] The ACLU argued that the injunction violated the First Amendment rights of the marchers to express themselves. The ACLU challenge was unsuccessful at the lower court level. The ACLU appealed on behalf of NSPA, but both the Illinois Appellate Court and the Illinois Supreme Court refused to expedite the case or to stay the injunction.
John Doe v. Alberto R. Gonzales (originally filed as Doe v.Ashcroft, renamed Doe v.Gonzalez, and finally issued as Doe v.Mukasey) was a case in which the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Library Connection, and several then-pseudonymous librarians, challenged Section 2709 of the Patriot Act; it was consolidated on appeal with a separate case, Doe v.
The ACLU-led lawsuit was filed on behalf of three immigrant advocacy groups in Texas and Arizona in federal court in Washington, D.C. The ACLU successfully blocked several Trump policies ...
The ACLU and its Washington, DC, chapter filed a brief in support of Donald Trump on Wednesday, arguing that the gag order against the former president in the federal election subversion case is ...
In F.C.C. v. Pacifica Foundation, the Supreme Court upheld the possibility of the FCC delivering administrative sanctions to a radio station for broadcasting George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" comedy routine. [6] In Reno v. ACLU, though, the Supreme Court held that this case law did not justify the CDA. The Court reasoned that the FCC's ...