Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A closing argument, summation, or summing up is the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case. A closing argument occurs after the presentation of evidence. A closing argument may not contain any new information and may only use evidence introduced at ...
The closer must be neutral and impartial, without allowing any of their personal opinions to affect the outcome. The view to be expressed in the closing statement should be what is best for the encyclopedia, as expressed by the will of the community. The influence of each argument on the final outcome should be weighted by the strength of the ...
Closing statement may refer to: Closing argument , or "summation", the concluding statement of each party's counsel in a court case Closing statement (real estate) , a document describing a real estate transaction
A unanimous opinion is one in which all of the justices agree and offer one rationale for their decision. A majority opinion is a judicial opinion agreed to by more than half of the members of a court. A majority opinion sets forth the decision of the court and an explanation of the rationale behind the court's decision.
A judge's stunning decision to dismiss the classified documents case against Donald Trump brought an abrupt halt to what experts have considered the strongest and most straightforward of the ...
The decision by Judge Aileen Cannon will be critical in shaping the timeline for Trump’s court proceedings this year. Read more about the Florida hearing here. Our politics team will be live ...
After a lunch break, into what approached an almost four-hour-long closing statement, Roos rested his case: "The defendant is overwhelmingly, beyond reasonable doubt, guilty." 'Bad business decisions'
Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. ( August 2013 ) ( Learn how and when to remove this message ) Legalese is an English term first used in 1914 [ 13 ] for legal writing that is very difficult for laymen to read and understand, the implication being that this abstruseness is deliberate for excluding the legally ...