enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Scientific misconceptions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconceptions

    Preconceived notions are thinking about a concept in only one way. Specially heat, gravity, and energy. Once a person knows how something works it is difficult to imagine it working a different way. Nonscientific beliefs are beliefs learned outside of scientific evidence. For example, one's beliefs about the history of world based on the bible.

  3. Rejection of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rejection_of_evolution_by...

    Creationists commonly argue against evolution on the grounds that "evolution is a religion; it is not a science," [130] in order to undermine the higher ground biologists claim in debating creationists, and to reframe the debate from being between science (evolution) and religion (creationism) to being between two equally religious beliefs—or ...

  4. Belief - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief

    It states that partial beliefs are basic and that full beliefs are to be conceived as partial beliefs above a certain threshold: for example, every belief above 0.9 is a full belief. [ 24 ] [ 29 ] [ 30 ] Defenders of a primitive notion of full belief, on the other hand, have tried to explain partial beliefs as full beliefs about probabilities ...

  5. Relationship between religion and science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_between...

    In Reconciling Science and Religion: The Debate in Early-twentieth-century Britain, historian of biology Peter J. Bowler argues that in contrast to the conflicts between science and religion in the U.S. in the 1920s (most famously the Scopes Trial), during this period Great Britain experienced a concerted effort at reconciliation, championed by ...

  6. Acceptance of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution_by...

    Theologians of note in the denomination whose work on science and religion shows the promise of cooperation include Thomas Jay Oord (Science of Love, The Altruism Reader, Defining Love), Michael Lodahl (God of Nature and of Grace), and Samuel M. Powell (Participating in God). These theologians see no major problem reconciling theology with the ...

  7. Scientific evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence

    These assumptions or beliefs will also affect how a person utilizes the observations as evidence. For example, the Earth's apparent lack of motion may be taken as evidence for a geocentric cosmology. However, after sufficient evidence is presented for heliocentric cosmology and the apparent lack of motion is explained, the initial observation ...

  8. Scientific skepticism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_skepticism

    From this perspective, he argues that skepticism takes on some aspects of a sacred discourse, as in Emile Durkheim's Elementary Forms of the Religious Life—Science, seen as pure and sacred (motivated by values of the mind and reason), is set apart from popular dealings with the paranormal, seen as profane (permeated by the economic and the ...

  9. Science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

    Science is a systematic discipline that builds and organises knowledge in the form of testable hypotheses and predictions about the universe. [1] [2] Modern science is typically divided into two or three major branches: [3] the natural sciences (e.g., physics, chemistry, and biology), which study the physical world; and the social sciences (e.g., economics, psychology, and sociology), which ...