Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Thanks to lemon laws in all 50 states (and Washington, D.C.) you can probably hire a lawyer for free who will arrange for the dealer to buy back your car. If an attorney who specializes in lemon ...
Lemon law protection arises under state law, with every U.S. state and the District of Columbia having its own lemon law. [1] Although the exact criteria vary by state, new vehicle lemon laws require that an auto manufacturer repurchase a vehicle that has a significant defect that the manufacturer is unable to repair within a reasonable amount of time. [2]
Stein's online search for a used car led him to M&H Auto Sales and Service, 2301 Parade St. He had spotted a 2011 Honda CR-V on the car lot's Facebook Marketplace ad and drove to Erie on June 3 to ...
The concept of describing a highly flawed item as a "lemon" predates its use in describing cars and can be traced back to the beginning of the 20th century as a British and American slang term. "To hand someone a lemon" in British slang dated 1906 was "to pass off a sub-standard article as a good one"; in 1909, American English slang use of ...
Here are some tips on buying a used car and how to ensure you aren't buying a lemon. An angry Utah man drove his car into a Mazda showroom after his return was denied — $10,000 in estimated damages.
The Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act (P.L. 93-637) is a United States federal law (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.). Enacted in 1975, the federal statute governs warranties on consumer products. The law does not require any product to have a warranty (it may be sold "as is"), but if it does have a warranty, the warranty must comply with this law.
The 2020 census put Kalispell's population at 24,558. [6] Among cities in Montana, it is the 8th largest by area, 7th most populous, and 8th fastest growing from 2010 to 2020. [6] In Montana's northwest region, it is the largest city and the commercial center of the Kalispell Micropolitan Statistical Area. [3]
Geier v. American Honda Motor Company, 529 U.S. 861 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a federal automobile safety standard pre-empted a stricter state rule. [1]