enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Precedent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent

    Precedent is a judicial decision that serves as an authority for courts when deciding subsequent identical or similar cases. [1] [2] [3] Fundamental to common law legal systems, precedent operates under the principle of stare decisis ("to stand by things decided"), where past judicial decisions serve as case law to guide future rulings, thus promoting consistency and predictability.

  3. Case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_law

    These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.

  4. Lists of landmark court decisions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_landmark_court...

    Establishing a "test" (that is, a measurable standard that can be applied by courts in future decisions), such as the Oakes test (in Canadian law) or the Bolam test (in English law). Sometimes, with regard to a particular provision of a written constitution, only one court decision has been made.

  5. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Such a decision may settle the law in more than one way: establishing a significant new legal principle or concept; overturning prior precedent based on its negative effects or flaws in its reasoning; distinguishing a new principle that refines a prior principle, thus departing from prior practice without violating the rule of stare decisis;

  6. What it means for the Supreme Court to throw out Chevron ...

    www.aol.com/news/means-supreme-court-throw...

    The Biden administration has defended the law, warning that overturning so-called Chevron deference would be destabilizing and could bring a “convulsive shock” to the nation's legal system.

  7. Legal opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_opinion

    A memorandum decision does not establish legal precedent or re-interpret the law, and cannot be invoked in subsequent cases to justify a ruling. Opinions, on the other hand, always establish a particular legal interpretation.

  8. Concurring opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurring_opinion

    But concurring opinions can sometimes be cited as a form of persuasive precedent (assuming the point of law is one on which there is no binding precedent already in effect). The conflict in views between a majority opinion and a concurring opinion can assist a lawyer in understanding the points of law articulated in the majority opinion.

  9. Case citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_citation

    A legal citation is a "reference to a legal precedent or authority, such as a case, statute, or treatise, that either substantiates or contradicts a given position." [1] Where cases are published on paper, the citation usually contains the following information: Court that issued the decision; Report title; Volume number; Page, section, or ...