Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Scientific laws or laws of science are statements, based on repeated experiments or observations, that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena. [1] The term law has diverse usage in many cases (approximate, accurate, broad, or narrow) across all fields of natural science ( physics , chemistry , astronomy , geoscience , biology ).
The justification of such a mathematical construct is solely and precisely that it is expected to work—that is, correctly to describe phenomena from a reasonably wide area. There is also an increasing attention to scientific modelling [4] in fields such as science education, [5] philosophy of science, systems theory, and knowledge visualization.
The Getting Things Done system is a model of personal workflow management for information workers. In software development, support and other industries, the concept of follow-the-sun describes a process of passing unfinished work across time zones.
Neo-colonial research or neo-colonial science, [36] [37] frequently described as helicopter research, [36] parachute science [38] [39] or research, [40] parasitic research, [41] [42] or safari study, [43] is when researchers from wealthier countries go to a developing country, collect information, travel back to their country, analyze the data ...
Bending Science: How special interests corrupt public health research is a 2008 book by Thomas O. McGarity and Wendy E. Wagner, published by Harvard University Press. Bending Science explores the ways that science is manipulated in the process of making public policy and the law. It has been called a "fascinating and troubling investigation."
Various fields of science, such as environmental science and clinical research, require the coordinated, standardized work of many participants. Additionally, any associated laboratory testing and experiment must be done in a way that is both ethically sound and results can be replicated by others using the same methods and equipment.
Allen states "there is an inverse relationship between things on your mind and those things getting done". [3] [a] The GTD method rests on the idea of moving all items of interest, relevant information, issues, tasks and projects out of one's mind by recording them externally and then breaking them into actionable work items with known time limits.
There are many philosophical and historical theories as to how scientific consensus changes over time. Because the history of scientific change is extremely complicated, and because there is a tendency to project "winners" and "losers" onto the past in relation to the current scientific consensus, it is very difficult to come up with accurate and rigorous models for scientific change. [17]