Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
PhD days are important in ones life. They influence the research career as well as the academic career of a person to a great extent. In many cases it influences the personal life of a person to a large degree. The quality of a PhD, in general, is assessed or understood by the thesis submitted by the student.
One can't predict what the editor will require. But the "expected" characteristics are probably best in the methodology. On the other hand, if the actual respondents didn't actually conform, then something in results might be essential. This would especially be true if there were no necessary characteristics in the target population.
Maybe its just a matter of taste, but I prefer to read articles/thesis that are "streamlined" and not the story with personal experience. (Don't get me wrong, I also enjoy to read stories about research and failed attempts, but not as articles or thesis, but, e.g. as blog post or in popular science books.) –
I'm confused by what the term "research experience" actually means in a PhD application. The following examples come into my mind: working as research assistant with university professor ; publishing research papers in conferences; work in R&D division of company (industry research) Do all examples of the list above count as research experience?
Briefly but clearly present my research objective or research question. Summarize the methodology and procedures that I used to carry out the research objective. Summarize the major contributions of the study (contributions to scholars and to practice). Brief outline of the structure of the rest of the article.
a good research topic in general (moves the field forward, publishable, etc.), interesting to you specifically (you'll be spending a LOT of time on it), a topic that (you and your advisor believe with some degree of confidence) can be addressed with the resources that are available to complete the thesis.
The problem here is likely deeper than just how to write a related work section. In order to publish a (good) scientific paper, you need to be able to compare your results to prior results---often directly and quantitatively in your experimental section.
All the three types of research revolve around an argument, a thesis. They of course differ in terms of student level, that is complexity. But, what makes a bachelor's thesis different from master's and PhD theses in terms of procedures of researching given that all of them may follow the same process of research, questions or hypotheses ...
Unless there is a good reason to the contrary, present tense will usually be interpreted as referring to the time at which the research was conducted. Past tense is a bit trickier --- depending on context, it might be interpreted in this same way, or it might be interpreted as meaning that the asserted fact was true at some time prior to the ...
Assuming that you are laying things out yourself, as opposed to working with one of the journals that will do it for you, think about the layout from the perspective of a reader: if you are reading text and looking at a figure, it's a pain to be flipping back and forth.