Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 1999, the Supreme Court declined to hear another appeal by Arizonans for Official English in a case in which the Arizona Supreme Court overturned Proposition 106. [ 3 ] In 2006, Arizona voters passed Proposition 103 with 74% of the vote, [ 11 ] [ 12 ] requiring "all official actions of the government be conducted in English" with exceptions ...
United States District Court for the District of Nevada; Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Decided: July 12, 2010: Citation: 611 F.3d 653, 38 Media L. Rep. 2057,No. 09-71265: Case history; Prior actions: Quixtar Inc. v. Signature Management Team, LLC: Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of ...
Nevada post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election First filing date Case Court Docket no(s). Outcome Comments References November 5, 2020: Stokke v. Cegavske Nevada District Court 2:20-CV-02046-APG-DJA Dropped [1] [2] [3] November 16, 2020: Marchant v. Gloria Nevada District Court, Clark County A-20-824884-W ...
The Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) was passed by Congress in 2000. CIPA was Congress's third attempt to regulate obscenity on the Internet, but the first two (the Communications Decency Act of 1996 and the Child Online Protection Act of 1998) were struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional free speech restrictions, largely due to vagueness and overbreadth issues that ...
Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., 570 U.S. 1 (2013), is a 2012-term United States Supreme Court case revolving around Arizona's unique voter registration requirements, including the necessity of providing documentary proof of citizenship. In a 7–2 decision, the Supreme Court held that Arizona's registration requirements were unlawful ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that speech made in a public place on a matter of public concern cannot be the basis of liability for a tort of emotional distress, even if the speech is viewed as offensive or outrageous.
AOL Mail welcomes Verizon customers to our safe and delightful email experience!