Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Rank State, federal district, or territory HDI (2022) [note 1] [1]1 Massachusetts 0.956 New Hampshire 3 Colorado 0.952 Washington 5 Minnesota 0.951 6 Connecticut 0.950
Territory [1] HDI Data Year Status Guam 0.901: 2008: Very High human development US Virgin Islands 0.894: 2008: Very High human development Puerto Rico 0.880: 2024: Very High human development
United States 0.956 3 Colorado Colorado United States 0.952 Washington Washington (state) United States 0.952 5 Minnesota Minnesota United States 0.951 Connecticut Connecticut United States 0.951 7 Alberta Alberta Canada 0.947 District of Columbia Washington, D.C. United States 0.947 - Hawaii: Hawaii United States 0.947 9
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 9 December 2024. Composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income indices "HDI" redirects here. For other uses, see HDI (disambiguation). For the complete ranking of countries, see List of countries by Human Development Index. World map of countries and territories by HDI scores in ...
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a summary index assessing countries on 3 dimensions, health, education and standard of living using life expectancy at birth, expected years of schooling for children and mean years of schooling for adults, and GNI PPP per capita. The final HDI is a value between 0 and 1 with countries grouped into four ...
English: A map of the Human Development Index within the United States. > 0.940 . 0.921 – 0.940 . 0.900 – 0.920 < 0.900. Date: 6 November 2020 : Source:
Overall, in the calendar year 2024, the United States' Nominal GDP at Current Prices totaled at $29.017 trillion, as compared to $25.744 trillion in 2022. The three U.S. states with the highest GDPs were California ($4.080 trillion), Texas ($2.695 trillion), and New York ($2.284 trillion).
The United States has the greatest income disparity among developed nations. [1] However, the inequality indicators vary considerably from state to state. States that have a high concentration of skilled jobs, implement regressive tax policies, or have weaker worker protections in general tend to have greater income inequalities.