enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Venables_and_Thompson...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts

  3. Murder of James Bulger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger

    On 12 February 1993 in Merseyside, two 10-year-old boys, Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, abducted, tortured, and murdered a two-year-old boy, James Patrick Bulger (16 March 1990 [2] – 12 February 1993). [3] [4] Thompson and Venables led Bulger away from the New Strand Shopping Centre in Bootle, after his mother had taken her eyes off him ...

  4. R v Home Secretary ex p Venables and Thompson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=R_v_Home_Secretary_ex_p...

    What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code

  5. James Bulger’s killer Jon Venables could be free by ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/james-bulger-killer-jon-venables...

    Thompson and Venables were jailed for life but released on licence with new identities in 2001. Venables, now 40, was sent back to prison in 2010 and 2017 for possessing indecent images of children.

  6. Venables and Robert Thompson tortured and killed two-year-old James Bulger after snatching him from a shopping centre in Bootle, Merseyside, in February 1993. They were just 10-years-old at the ...

  7. James Bulger’s parents ‘relieved’ killer Jon Venables refused ...

    www.aol.com/james-bulger-parents-relieved-killer...

    Justice Secretary Alex Chalk said: “James Bulger’s barbaric murder was a crime that shocked the nation and I welcome the Parole Board’s decision to keep his killer behind bars.

  8. Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevant_and_irrelevant...

    In the United Kingdom, a seminal case applying this principle is R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables (1997). [9] In this case, the Home Secretary had taken into account public opinion when deciding upon the tariff of 15 years for holding in custody two boys detained at Her Majesty's pleasure for having murdered ...

  9. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Northumbria Police Authority [1989] 1 QB 26 was an English administrative law decision that first recognised the prerogative power to do whatever "was necessary to meet either an actual or an apprehended threat to the peace".