Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States. [1][2] The motor vehicle exception allows officers to search a vehicle without a search warrant if they have probable cause to believe that evidence or contraband is in the vehicle. [3] The exception is based on the idea that there is a lower expectation of privacy in motor vehicles because of the regulations under which they ...
A company car is a vehicle which companies or organizations lease or own and which employees use for their personal and business travel. [1] A take-home vehicle is a vehicle which can be taken home by company employees. Depending on the company, company cars may be available to all employees or just top-level personnel.
United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982), was a search and seizure case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States.The high court was asked to decide if a legal warrantless search of an automobile allows closed containers found in the vehicle (specifically, in the trunk) to be searched as well.
Chimel v. California. Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. [1]
Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case which analyzed whether police officers may extend the length of a traffic stop to conduct a search with a trained detection dog. [1] In a 6–3 opinion, the Court held that officers may not extend the length of a traffic stop to conduct a dog sniff unrelated ...
Proposition 47, also known by its ballot title Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute, was a referendum passed by voters in the state of California on November 4, 2014. The measure was also referred to by its supporters as the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act. [ 2 ]
Dec. 19—Policy brings city in line with IRS guidelines A new policy set to be introduced by the Austin City Council addressing the city's take home vehicle policy has caused concerns among ...
Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [ 1 ] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. [ 2 ][ 3 ] The case arose from inconsistent rulings on cell phone searches from ...