Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that states could not determine eligibility for federal office, including the presidency, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Indiana University law professor Gerard Magliocca, an expert on the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban,” testifies at former President Donald Trump’s disqualification trial in Colorado ...
In a divided 4-3 decision, the Colorado justices, who were all appointed by Democratic governors, ruled that Trump is ineligible to return to the White House under the 14th Amendment, citing his ...
This is one of several 14th Amendment challenges against Trump ... that Trump “engaged in an insurrection” on January 6, 2021, and “acted with the specific intent to incite political ...
In ruling to remove Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot, the Colorado Supreme ... 14th Amendment as it applies to the insurrection attempt on January 6. ... the 14th Amendment, Section 3, applies to ...
The Colorado decision was stayed pending appeal, and Trump was included on the certified ballot, which began to be mailed to overseas voters on January 20. [14] On March 4, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a ruling unanimously reversing the Colorado Supreme Court decision , ruling that states had no authority to remove Trump from their ballots ...
A divided Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state ...
A trial to determine if the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” applies to former President Donald Trump is set to begin Monday in Denver, an historic but likely longshot case that could ...