Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Errors and omissions (E&O) insurance, which may exclude negligent acts other than errors and omissions ("mistakes"), is most often used by consultants and brokers and agents of various sorts, including notaries public, real estate brokers, insurance agents themselves, appraisers, management consultants and information technology service providers (there are specific E&O policies for software ...
Full tort insurance is a form of coverage that allows you to sue the other party for medical and medical-related damages. Full tort car insurance is not available in all states.
Turn to this glossary when you're just not sure if "dual agent" means two real estate agents will be working on your contract or that one agent represents both the buyer and the seller (it's the ...
The new firm, Real Estate Title Insurance Company of Philadelphia, would "insure the purchasers of real estate and mortgages against losses from defective titles, liens and encumbrances," and that "through these facilities, transfer of real estate and real estate securities can be made more speedily and with greater security than heretofore."
Insurance bad faith is a tort [1] unique to the law of the United States (but with parallels elsewhere, particularly Canada) that an insurance company commits by violating the "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing" which automatically exists by operation of law in every insurance contract.
The Texas Department of Insurance's site HelpInsure.com can help you find coverage. If your rates increase or you face loss of coverage, ask the insurance company how you can reduce risk factors.
In states where there is a choice of coverage, most consumers choose traditional tort regimes because the cost of the no-fault regime is more expensive. 24 states originally enacted no-fault laws in some form between 1970 and 1975; several of them have repealed their no-fault laws over time. Colorado repealed its no-fault system in 2003.
Most liability insurance policies provide for coverage of negligently inflicted injuries but exclude coverage of intentionally inflicted injuries. If a victim is intentionally injured by a person, many theorists perceive that the victim will tend to recast the claim as being one for negligence in order to fall within the coverage of the ...