enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California ranked nation’s fifth-worst 'judicial hellhole ...

    www.aol.com/california-ranked-nation-fifth-worst...

    (The Center Square) - California was ranked the nation’s fifth-worst “judicial hellhole” this year, improving from its third-place ranking last year by the American Tort Reform Foundation, a ...

  3. Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunkl_v._Regents_of_the...

    Specifically, California courts had a history of holding exculpatory liability waivers within contracts to be valid only if they did not involve the "public interest." This case history arose in relation to Cal. Civ. Code §1668, a statute that states "All contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt anyone from ...

  4. Ramona false memory case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramona_false_memory_case

    In the Harvard Law Review, Bowman and Mertz published an analysis of the Ramona case in the context of California courts’ history of third-party tort liability. They reported that the Ramona case was “atypical” and a “major diversion from the current state of tort law.” No adequate precedent for the third-party responsibility imposed ...

  5. Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sindell_v._Abbott_Laboratories

    In a 4-3 majority decision by Associate Justice Stanley Mosk, the court decided to impose a new kind of liability, known as market share liability.The doctrine evolved from a line of negligence and strict products liability opinions (most of which had been decided by the Supreme Court of California) that were being adopted as the majority rule in many U.S. states.

  6. Legal malpractice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_malpractice

    To satisfy the third element, legal malpractice requires proof of what would have happened had the attorney not been negligent; that is, "but for" the attorney's negligence ("but for" causation). [3] If the same result would have occurred without negligence by the attorney, no cause of action will be permitted. "But for" or actual causation can ...

  7. Slander of title - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slander_of_title

    Novell case). Slander of title is a form of jactitation. [2] Slander of title is one of the "specialized" common law intentional torts. The State of California has adopted the definition of slander of title set forth in section 624 of the Restatement of Torts as follows:

  8. Malicious prosecution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_prosecution

    Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort.Like the tort of abuse of process, its elements include (1) intentionally (and maliciously) instituting and pursuing (or causing to be instituted or pursued) a legal action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3) dismissed in favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution.

  9. Personal injury - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_injury

    Personal injury cases represent the most common type of lawsuits filed in United States federal district courts, representing 25.5 percent of cases filed in 2015. [25] Personal injury claims represent a considerably smaller percentage of cases filed in state courts. For example, in Illinois, tort claims represent approximately 7% of the civil ...