Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In order to bring a false advertising claim, it is imperative that the plaintiff demonstrate that the defendant actually made false/misleading statement to their own or another's product, that at least a tendency to deceive a large amount of the intended audience was present, and that there was a likelihood of injury to the plaintiff, among ...
Argument: Oral argument: Case history; Prior: Respondent censured, In Re Peel, 126 Ill. 2d 397 (1989); certiorari granted, 492 U.S. 917 (1989) Holding; Attorney advertising that accurately stated a private professional certification was not misleading, and therefore was protected as commercial speech under the First Amendment.
Deceptive advertising is any statement by an advertiser that is false or misleading, or that does not adequately identify itself as an advertisement. According to the United States Federal Trade Commission : "A basic truth-in-advertising principle is that it's deceptive to mislead consumers about the commercial nature of content.
DAVE (DAVE): Free Stock Analysis Report. This article Fin Tech Firm Dave Faces Legal Action Over Alleged Hidden Fees, Misleading Advertising originally appeared on Benzinga.com
Subway sandwich ads are "grossly misleading," lawsuit claims ... shop was a far cry from the generous helpings of thinly sliced steak and cheese on hero bread shown in the company's advertising ...
A U.S. Federal Trade Commission official said on Wednesday that the country's leading seafood restaurant chains have been warned that the agency will crack down on false claims of locally caught ...
Notably, Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act focuses on false advertising and unfair competition, providing a legal recourse for individuals and businesses. [10] This section enables legal action against those engaging in misleading advertising practices that may cause confusion about the origin of goods or services.
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the right of lawyers to advertise their services. [1] In holding that lawyer advertising was commercial speech entitled to protection under the First Amendment (incorporated against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment), the Court upset the tradition against advertising ...