enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Oposa v. Factoran - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oposa_v._Factoran

    Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, 224 S.C.R.A. 792 (1993), alternatively titled Minors Oposa v.Factoran or Minors Oposa, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines recognizing the doctrine of intergenerational responsibility on the environment in the Philippine legal system.

  3. Amparo and habeas data in the Philippines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amparo_and_habeas_data_in...

    In the Philippines, amparo and habeas data are prerogative writs to supplement the inefficacy of the writ of habeas corpus (Rule 102, Revised Rules of Court). Amparo means 'protection,' while habeas data is 'access to information.' [1] Both writs were conceived to solve the extensive Philippine extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances since 1999.

  4. Amado V. Hernandez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amado_V._Hernandez

    Amado Vera Hernandez (September 13, 1903 – March 24, 1970), was a Filipino writer and labor leader who was known for his criticism of social injustices in the Philippines and was later imprisoned for his involvement in the communist movement. He was the central figure in a landmark legal case that took 13 years to settle.

  5. Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebralinag_v._Division...

    Division Superintendent (219 SCRA 256, G.R. No. 95770 et al. (1993) was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines concerning freedom of religion in schools.

  6. Lists of landmark court decisions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_landmark_court...

    Law v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) Supreme Court [1999] 1 SCR 497: Charter of Rights, section 15(1) (Equality rights) Establishes the "Law test" for identifying Charter-prohibited discrimination. Canada (AG) v Hislop: Supreme Court: 2007 SCC 10: Charter of Rights, section 15 (Equality rights)

  7. People of the Philippines v. Hernandez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Philippines...

    The Court was divided upon the decision, having a vote of 6-4 (one justice died a month before its promulgation). But it was later on accepted as valuable jurisprudence, starting with the subsequent case of People of the Philippines v. Geronimo (100 Phil. Reports 90). The case is now a standard case study in Philippine law schools.

  8. Philippine habeas corpus cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_habeas_corpus_cases

    At the early years of the American Rule in the Philippines, lawlessness was rampant and criminal activities were at large. Governor-General James Francis Smith, with the consent of the Philippine Commission, suspended the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus in the provinces of Batangas and Cavite.

  9. League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Cities_of_the...

    League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines about the validity of the cityhood laws of 16 municipalities in the Philippines. The case clarifies the requirements for the conversion of a municipality into a component city .