enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Epilogue - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epilogue

    An epilogue or epilog (from Greek ἐπίλογος epílogos, "conclusion" from ἐπί epi, "in addition" and λόγος logos, "word") is a piece of writing at the end of a work of literature, usually used to bring closure to the work. [1] It is presented from the perspective of within the story.

  3. Begging the question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

    It may take the form of an unstated premise which is essential but not identical to the conclusion, or is "controversial or questionable for the same reasons that typically might lead someone to question the conclusion": [15]... [S]eldom is anyone going to simply place the conclusion word-for-word into the premises ... Rather, an arguer might ...

  4. Logical consequence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

    A valid logical argument is one in which the conclusion is entailed by the premises, because the conclusion is the consequence of the premises. The philosophical analysis of logical consequence involves the questions: In what sense does a conclusion follow from its premises? and What does it mean for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises ...

  5. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Referential fallacy [45] – assuming that all words refer to existing things and that the meaning of words reside within the things they refer to, as opposed to words possibly referring to no real object (e.g.: Pegasus) or that the meaning comes from how they are used (e.g.: "nobody" was in the room).

  6. Syllogism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism

    Each premise and the conclusion can be of type A, E, I or O, and the syllogism can be any of the four figures. A syllogism can be described briefly by giving the letters for the premises and conclusion followed by the number for the figure. For example, the syllogism BARBARA below is AAA-1, or "A-A-A in the first figure".

  7. Circular reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

    Other ways to express this are that there is no reason to accept the premises unless one already believes the conclusion, or that the premises provide no independent ground or evidence for the conclusion. [3] Circular reasoning is closely related to begging the question, and in modern usage the two generally refer to the same thing. [4]

  8. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    The presence of the formal fallacy does not imply anything about the argument's premises or its conclusion. Both may actually be true or may even be more probable as a result of the argument, but the deductive argument is still invalid because the conclusion does not follow from the premises in the manner described.

  9. Executive summary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_summary

    Executive summaries are important as a communication tool in both academia and business. For example, members of Texas A&M University's Department of Agricultural Economics observe that "An executive summary is an initial interaction between the writers of the report and their target readers: decision makers, potential customers, and/or peers.