enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Don't cite essays or proposals as if they were policy

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don't_cite_essays...

    As an example, when the topic is too difficult to discuss in a short talk page message, cite an essay in a way that clearly says it's an essay. Make sure the cite is given as advice, not admonishment. For example, say "I really think you might want to cut down on the essays. The example essay describes well why I feel you're going a little ...

  3. Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Researching_with...

    For example, Cornell University's online guide to APA style uses citations from Britannica in some of its examples. However, because of Wikipedia's unique nature, there are also some rules for conducting research that are special to Wikipedia, and some general rules that do not apply to Wikipedia.

  4. Wikipedia : Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    This page details arguments that are commonly seen in deletion discussions that have been identified as generally unsound and unconvincing. These are arguments that should generally be avoided – or at the least supplemented with a better-grounded rationale for the position taken, whether that be "keep", "delete" or some other objective.

  5. Wikipedia:Research help/Proposal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Research_help/...

    The Wikipedia Library team has created a research portal to provide research learning opportunities for these audiences, to teach basic information and research literacy, to direct users to best practices for accessing research materials identified on Wikipedia, and to guide them in contributing to Wikipedia to improve access to these resources ...

  6. Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org evaluate article - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dashboard.wikiedu...

    Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Tone and Balance Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view ; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.

  7. Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_is...

    A user can in effect exercise ownership over the topics they have the time and energy to defend. Self-appointed censors, fanatics, or other sufficiently dedicated users can further an agenda or prohibit new ideas through persistent attention to a particular page. Even listing examples of this creates problems, such as false accusations and ...

  8. Template:Wikipedia essays - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wikipedia_essays

    Parameter state controls the entire template; state1 controls the building essays; state2 controls the civility essays; state3 controls the notability essays; state4 controls the humour essays; state5 controls the 'About essays' section. These can be set to expanded or collapsed. The above example will produce this:

  9. Wikipedia : Neutral point of view/Draft (Rewrite proposal)

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Draft_(Rewrite_proposal)

    NPOV (Neutral Point Of View) is a fundamental Wikipedia principle which states that all articles must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly and without bias. This includes reader-facing templates, categories and portals. According to Wikipedia founder Jimbo Wales, NPOV is "absolute and non-negotiable".