enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mandatory sentencing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_sentencing

    Mandatory sentencing laws vary across nations; they are more prevalent in common law jurisdictions because civil law jurisdictions usually prescribe minimum and maximum sentences for every type of crime in explicit laws. Mandatory sentencing laws often target "moral vices" (such as alcohol, sex, drugs) and crimes that threaten a person's ...

  3. Judicial discretion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_discretion

    three-strikes laws and most sex offender registry laws in US are examples of laws carrying severe consequences, and which does not leave room for sentencing judges to consider the actual gravity of the offense, thus significantly limiting judicial discretion in sentencing. Introduction of mandatory minimum in criminal sentencing is often viewed ...

  4. United States constitutional sentencing law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States...

    The Supreme Court has held that every fact that increases the maximum authorized sentence or minimum mandatory sentence must be named in the charging instrument, submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt—whether or not statutory law labels that fact as an element of the offense or a sentencing factor. [25]

  5. Why some states are reforming minimum sentencing ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/why-states-reforming-minimum...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Why the sentence imposed on Michigan school shooter Ethan ...

    www.aol.com/why-sentence-imposed-michigan-school...

    “The mandatory sentencing schemes before us violate this principle of proportionality, and so violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment,” Kagan said.

  7. Florida’s minimum mandatory sentences need a hard look ...

    www.aol.com/news/florida-minimum-mandatory...

    In theory, minimum mandatory sentencing laws ensure that criminal penalties are handed down evenly. In reality, they can create glaringly unjust outcomes like in the case of Kyle Moran, who ...

  8. List of United States Supreme Court opinions involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Harris, 465 U.S. 37 (1984) — A state appellate court, before it affirms a death sentence, is not required to compare the sentence in the case before it with the penalties imposed in similar cases if requested to do so by the prisoner. Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (1990) — Mandatory appellate review is not required in death penalty cases.

  9. Three-strikes law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-strikes_law

    The practice of imposing longer prison sentences on repeat offenders (versus first-time offenders who commit the same crime) is present throughout most of American history, as judges often take into consideration prior offenses when sentencing. However, there is a more recent history of mandatory prison sentences for repeat offenders. [8]