enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Manual of Style/Linking

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Linking

    Month-and-day articles (e.g. February 24 and 10 July) and year articles (e.g. 1795, 1955, 2007) should not be linked unless the linked date or year has a significant connection to the subject of the linking article, beyond that of the date itself, so that the linking enhances the reader's understanding of the subject. For example:

  3. Wikipedia:Manual of Style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_style

    Unlike page headings, table headers do not automatically generate link anchors. Aside from sentence case in glossaries, the heading advice also applies to the term entries in description lists . If using template-structured glossaries , terms will automatically have link anchors, but will not otherwise.

  4. Wikipedia : Date formatting and linking poll/Year-linking ...

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Year-linking_responses

    Support appropriate guidance. years are rarely useful, so generally should not be linked. occasionally they can be helpful (e.g. linking 1970s in the article western cosmetics in the 1970s, so readers can see other cultural changes of the era). because there is a particular problem with overlinking years (a relic of autoformatting of yore) it ...

  5. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 110

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    I asked for an alternative to date-linking years ago--JimWae 19:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC) At present, autoformatting and most forms of date linking are one and the same. I don't believe any of the proposals to modify the autoformatting code will ever go into production, so I just don't take those discussions into account.

  6. AOL Mail for Verizon Customers - AOL Help

    help.aol.com/products/aol-mail-verizon

    Why can’t I sort email by the header? Find out how to change your inbox style if you can’t sort your mail with the column headings. AOL Mail for Verizon Customers · Apr 30, 2024

  7. The extent of linking is such that it is off putting. I'm not convinced that linking dates improves the knowledge of the reader anyway. Then we have the problem where dates aren't even linked correctly, this has to be corrected by another user. The pro's of linking dates do not out way the con's. — Realist 2 23:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

  8. List of HTTP header fields - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_header_fields

    The form of encoding used to safely transfer the entity to the user. Currently defined methods are: chunked, compress, deflate, gzip, identity. Must not be used with HTTP/2. [14] Transfer-Encoding: chunked: Permanent RFC 9110: Tk Tracking Status header, value suggested to be sent in response to a DNT(do-not-track), possible values:

  9. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/RFC ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    Many date-linkers are not suggesting going to a page like 1345, instead, they are suggesting linking to a page that pretty much gives a list of events that occurred during a year, such as 2008. (The date-linkers also find it necessary to link to things like 1 Jan —a pointless link in my humble opinion.)