Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Political cartoon from the Portland Telegram criticizing the Act and depicting how it can brew resentment in immigrant communities (1922). In 1922, the Masonic Grand Lodge of Oregon sponsored an initiative to require all school-age children to attend public schools, officially called the Compulsory Education Act and unofficially known as the Oregon School Law. [3]
The vision of the standards-based education reform movement [9] is that all teenagers will receive a meaningful high school diploma that serves essentially as a public guarantee that they can read, write, and do basic mathematics (typically through first-year algebra) at a level which might be useful to an employer. To avoid a surprising ...
The Compulsory Education Act, before amendment, had required Oregon children between eight and sixteen years of age to attend public school. There were several exceptions incorporated into this Act: Children who were mentally or physically unable to attend school; Children who had graduated from eighth grade
Two important features characterized the education reforms of this movement. First, as in other fields of public service provision, a focus on outcomes and results became crucial. This type of performance evaluation required the definition of both particular standards and broader objectives in the pursuit of educational goals.
The Oregon State Board of Education sets standards and policies for public schools, from kindergarten through grade twelve, in the U.S. state of Oregon. The State Board of Education was established first in 1872. [2] As defined by the Oregon legislature in 1951, the Board has seven members who are appointed by the Governor and approved by the ...
The Oregon Department of Education is the department responsible for implementing Oregon's public education policies, including academic standards and testing, credentials, and other matters not reserved to the local districts and boards. The department is overseen by the Governor, acting as State Superintendent of Public Instruction. [1]
Extended the Higher Education Act to June 30, 2008. Pub. L. 110–238 (text) 2008 (No short title) Extended the Higher Education Act to July 31, 2008. Pub. L. 110–256 (text) 2008 (No short title) Extended the Higher Education Act to August 15, 2008. Pub. L. 110–300 (text) 2008 Need-Based Educational Aid Act of 2008
Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the states of Oregon, Texas, Arizona, and Idaho challenged the constitutionality of Sections 201, 202, and 302 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) Amendments of 1970 passed by the 91st United States Congress, and where John Mitchell was the respondent in his role as United States Attorney General. [1]