Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The judge and Thaler agreed in this case that Thaler himself is unable to receive the patent on behalf of DABUS. [ citation needed ] In their August 5, 2022, Thaler decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed that only a natural person could be an inventor, which means that the AI that invents any other type of invention ...
Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (PL 93-596 of January 2, 1975) [4] C. Marshall Dann: 1974: 1977 Donald W. Banner: 1978: 1979 Sidney A. Diamond: 1979: 1981 Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (Public Law 97-366 of October 25, 1982) [4] Gerald J. Mossinghoff: 1981: 1985 Donald J. Quigg: 1985: 1990 ...
The Commissioner of Patents may refer to: Commissioner of Patents (Australia) Commissioner of Patents (Canada) Commissioner for Patents (US) who oversees the United States Patent and Trademark Office and reports to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property. List of people who have headed the United States Patent Office
Pages in category "United States Commissioners of Patents" The following 22 pages are in this category, out of 22 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. B.
He served in that office only during the Carter Administration from 1978 to 1979. After his time as Commissioner of Patents he entered private practice with the firm now known as Banner & Witcoff. [4] He also served as director of the Patent Law Division at John Marshall Law School. [5] He died on January 29, 2006, in Tucson, Arizona. [6]
He was the United States Commissioner of Patents of the United States Patent Office (now the United States Patent and Trademark Office) from 1898 to 1901. He resumed private practice in New York City from 1901 to 1904. [1] He was a presidential elector in 1908. [2]
The long history of patents and strong protection of patent holders contributes to abuse of the system by patent trolls, which are largely absent in other countries. [citation needed] The US also has an extensive body of case law comprising federal court precedents that have accumulated over more than 200 years.
Until Bilski v. Kappos [11] and Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International [12] about four decades later, Johnston was the only business-method patent case that the Supreme Court had so far decided. But the decision turns on obviousness rather than patent eligibility. Despite the fact that most of the pages of the government's brief on the merits ...