Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
One is the "Consent to Search" law which requires an officer to inform someone they have the right to deny a search and to make sure that person understands that right. The other is the "NYPD ID" law, which requires the officer, in certain situations, to hand out business cards with their name, rank, badge number and command.
Whereas withdrawal of application for admission requires the consent of both the authorities (CBP or the Immigration Judge) and the alien, expedited removal does not require the alien's consent. An alien who refuses to withdraw the application for admission may instead be subject to expedited removal (by the CBP) or removal through an order by ...
Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990) - search valid if police reasonably believe consent given by owner; Florida v. Bostick (1991) - not "free to leave" but "free to decline" on bus; Florida v. Jimeno (1991) - can request officer to limit scope of search; Ohio v. Robinette (1996) - do not have to inform motorist is free to go; United States v.
Demeter's Manual of Parliamentary Law and Procedure states that requests for any unallowable purpose need unanimous consent, and a single objection defeats consent, unless the organization's laws or the assembly's usual practices allow otherwise. An example might be a request to have a nonmember address the body.
Earlier this year, during hundreds of hours of discussion, our vast knowledge of and extensive experience dealing with Ohio’s parental consent laws were key factors that shaped and defined Issue 1.
The right to be forgotten (RTBF [1]) is the right to have private information about a person be removed from Internet searches and other directories in some circumstances. . The issue has arisen from desires of individuals to "determine the development of their life in an autonomous way, without being perpetually or periodically stigmatized as a consequence of a specific action performed in the pa
Right of Withdrawal: Consumers have the right to cancel or withdraw from a purchase within 14 days of making it. This gives consumers the opportunity to review their purchase and protect them from impulsive decisions. It also gives consumers a chance to decide if the purchase is something they really want or need.
QTCinderella said the current legal framework is “disheartening.” “Every single lawyer I’ve talked to essentially have come to the conclusion that we don’t have a case; there’s no way ...