Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The opinion of the district court judge denying preliminary injunction was 101 pages, unusually lengthy for that stage of the case. Judge Leichty addressed at length the question of whether the 1905 United States Supreme Court case of Jacobson v. Massachusetts was still the appropriate legal precedent to follow, concluding that it was.
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge to a 2021 Connecticut law that eliminated the state’s longstanding religious exemption from childhood immunization requirements for schools ...
The court said it will hear oral argument on challenges to the vaccination and mask requirements for large employers and for health care workers. Supreme Court to hear challenges to Biden's Covid ...
The Supreme Court will hear legal challenges to the Biden administration's employer vaccine mandates next month, the justices announced Wednesday night, setting a rapid schedule for the cases.In a ...
The U.S. Supreme Court issued two highly anticipated rulings on Thursday, temporarily blocking a Biden administration COVID-19 vaccine mandate for large employers but allowing a separate rule ...
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state. Jacobson has been invoked in numerous ...
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that plaintiffs suing three manufacturers of thimerosal could bypass the vaccine court and litigate in either state or federal court using the ordinary channels for recovery in tort. [14] This was the first instance where a federal appeals court has held that a suit of this nature may bypass the vaccine court.
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday refused to block a plan by Indiana University to require students and employees to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Barrett's action came in ...