enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stephen St. C. Bostock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_St._C._Bostock

    He argues that as the right-to-freedom criterion of zoos can be purportedly met under ideal conditions, thus the rights argument against zoos becomes invalid. [ 9 ] Philosopher Ann S. Causey has written that "Bostock's arguments intended to demonstrate the freedom and well-being of zoo animals are weak and unlikely to convince any but the ...

  3. In Defense of Animals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Defense_of_Animals

    IDA believes that zoos lead to the premature deaths of elephants [citation needed] and that "urban zoos simply don't have enough space for these magnificent, intelligent animals". [26] IDA's campaign against elephants in zoos is also supported by animal rights group PETA. [27] IDA publishes an annual list of the "10 worst zoos for elephants ...

  4. Oscar Horta - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_Horta

    Óscar Horta Álvarez (born 7 May 1974) [1] is a Spanish animal rights activist and moral philosopher who is a professor in the Department of Philosophy and Anthropology at the University of Santiago de Compostela (USC) and one of the co-founders of the nonprofit organization Animal Ethics.

  5. Animal rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights

    The law only requires that any suffering not be "unnecessary". In deciding what counts as "unnecessary", an animal's interests are weighed against the interests of human beings, and the latter almost always prevail. [53] Francione's Animals, Property, and the Law (1995) was the first extensive jurisprudential treatment of animal rights.

  6. Argument from marginal cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_marginal_cases

    Daniel Dombrowski writes that the argument can be traced to Porphyry's third-century treatise On Abstinence from Eating Animals. [7] Danish philosopher Laurids Smith who was familiar with the arguments of Wilhelm Dietler argued against the idea that animals cannot possess rights because they cannot understand the ideas of right and duty.

  7. The Case for Animal Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Case_for_Animal_Rights

    The Case for Animal Rights is a 1983 book by the American philosopher Tom Regan, in which the author argues that at least some kinds of non-human animals have moral rights because they are the "subjects-of-a-life", and that these rights adhere to them whether or not they are recognized. [1]

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Speciesism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciesism

    The term speciesism, and the argument that it is a prejudice, first appeared in 1970 in a privately printed pamphlet written by British psychologist Richard D. Ryder. Ryder was a member of a group of academics in Oxford , England, the nascent animal rights community, now known as the Oxford Group .